Skip to content
646 269 0773|alita@globalbioethics.org
facebooktwitterlinkedin
Global Bioethics Initiative (GBI) Logo Global Bioethics Initiative (GBI) Logo Global Bioethics Initiative (GBI) Logo
  • Home
  • About
  • Staff
    • Founders
    • Board of Directors
    • Advisory Board
    • Visiting Scholars
    • Student Interns
    • Volunteers
  • Events
  • Resources
    • COVID-19
  • Internships
  • Contact
  • Donate
Previous Next
  • View Larger Image young child

Surrogacy in China, as the One-Child Policy Comes to an End

By Princess Chukwuneke

At the start of 2016, China amended its one-child policy that had been in motion for 30 years. Perhaps it was because surrogacy had wormed its way into family planning among the richer members of the Chinese population, a concern for a vast majority of citizens who could not afford such a luxury. The amendment could have also been a response to China’s aging and increasingly male population. Whatever the case, legislation opened the way for couples to have two children.  However, this ruling included a provision banning surrogacy in an effort to “dissuade population control circumvention.”

Thus, it was a surprise when this provision was lifted. Apparently, lawmakers were concerned that barring surrogacy would create a push for it, driving surrogacy services underground and overseas. The ban lift is also suggestive of China’s rapidly changing attitude toward family and bloodlines.

This new freedom could not have come sooner. Apart from battling the stagnancy of replacing a 30-year policy, a significant number of women were found to be infertile (according to research conducted by the China Population Association, 12.5% of women of child-bearing age were infertile). Further, several parents could not have a second child through In-Vitro Fertilization (IVF) due to health reasons. As a result, surrogacy became an attractive choice for those who could afford it.

However, surrogacy was not without its limits. A study conducted in 2014 by the New York Times reported that the number of surrogate babies born in China every year is over 10,000, not including the numbers born through underground and overseas channels. Despite these numbers, there is still no protection under the law for surrogate mothers or those who hire them. Families risk losing to surrogates who may later choose to keep the child, and surrogates in turn are responsible for whatever physical or psychological trauma they face during the process.

This article suggests that the Chinese law should recognize and regulate surrogacy, marking it a respectable avenue for begetting a child. While the author does not believe that legalization of surrogacy alone would solve China’s baby boom dilemma, he espouses it as a step toward contributing to China’s already expanding reproductive freedom.

Watch the video here.

Other Posts

Prof Cheah Phaik YeongAna Lita2022-11-07T18:55:06+00:00
2022 “Bioethics, Wars and Pandemics” TestimonialsAna Lita2022-08-11T02:32:40+00:00
Bioethics in the Second Cold War by Jonathan D Moreno PhDAna Lita2022-06-07T15:42:38+00:00
Call for Applications: “Bioethics, Wars and Pandemics” Summer School Online (July 18 – 23) 2022Ana Lita2022-06-07T14:33:04+00:00
By Admin@gbi|2020-04-09T23:49:13+00:00February 27th, 2016|News-Articles|2 Comments

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

facebooktwitterlinkedinreddittumblrpinterestvkEmail

About the Author: Admin@gbi

Avatar

Related Posts

  • Prof Cheah Phaik Yeong
    Prof Cheah Phaik Yeong
    Gallery

    Prof Cheah Phaik Yeong

  • 2022 “Bioethics, Wars and Pandemics” Testimonials
    2022 “Bioethics, Wars and Pandemics” Testimonials
    Gallery

    2022 “Bioethics, Wars and Pandemics” Testimonials

  • Bioethics in the Second Cold War by Jonathan D Moreno PhD
    Bioethics in the Second Cold War by Jonathan D Moreno PhD
    Gallery

    Bioethics in the Second Cold War by Jonathan D Moreno PhD

  • Call for Applications: “Bioethics, Wars and Pandemics” Summer School Online (July 18 – 23) 2022
    Call for Applications: “Bioethics, Wars and Pandemics” Summer School Online (July 18 – 23) 2022
    Gallery

    Call for Applications: “Bioethics, Wars and Pandemics” Summer School Online (July 18 – 23) 2022

  • Mariupol Maternity Hospital Third To Be Destroyed In Ukraine: UN
    Mariupol Maternity Hospital Third To Be Destroyed In Ukraine: UN
    Gallery

    Mariupol Maternity Hospital Third To Be Destroyed In Ukraine: UN

2 Comments

  1. Surrogacy in China, as the One-Child Policy Comes to an End - Bioethics Research Library February 27, 2016 at 3:45 pm

    […] Source: Global Bioethics Initiative News and Articles. […]

  2. February 2016 Newsletter - Global Bioethics Initiative March 12, 2016 at 12:20 pm

    […] Surrogacy in China, as the One-Child Policy Comes to an End […]

Comments are closed.

Recent Tweets

Tweets by GBISummerSchool

Find us on Facebook

Copyright 2012 - 2020 Global Bioethics | All Rights Reserved | Powered by Global Innovation Consortium
facebooktwitterlinkedin
Toggle Sliding Bar Area