Skip to content
646 269 0773|alita@globalbioethics.org
facebooktwitterlinkedin
Global Bioethics Initiative (GBI) Logo Global Bioethics Initiative (GBI) Logo Global Bioethics Initiative (GBI) Logo
  • Home
  • About
  • Staff
    • Founders
    • Board of Directors
    • Advisory Board
    • Visiting Scholars
    • Student Interns
    • Volunteers
  • Events
  • Resources
    • COVID-19
  • Internships
  • Contact
  • Donate
Previous Next
  • View Larger Image

Canadian Law that Excepts Religious Hospitals from Offering Assisted Deaths Disputed by Dying with Dignity

The Canadian not-for-profit Dying with Dignity is considering challenging provincial Ontario legislation that permits religiously affiliated hospitals to refrain from offering medically assisted death. Under current Ontario law, hospitals, hospices and long-term care centers that wish not to facilitate assisted death may refrain from doing so, and are instead obligated to transfer the patient to an alternative willing healthcare facility. In this respect, the legislation parallels hospitals’ option to electively refrain from performing abortions on ethical grounds outlined by the Catholic Health Alliance of Canada. Under a potentially emergent legal challenge, however, these publicly funded healthcare facilities could lose their permission to deny direct facilitation of a patient’s death.

As part of its rationale for challenging the law, Dying with Dignity cites the prospective trauma that a patient can further undergo if a transfer is necessary. The not-for-profit’s chief executive Shanaaz Gokool also stated that “what Ontario did is they gave an opt-out to basic and essential health care to hospitals that don’t want to provide for the dying.” Though it is challenging a healthcare facility’s legal right to refrain from assisting death, it maintains that individual healthcare providers ought to maintain that individual right.

To date, over 630 Ontarians have legally ended their lives with medical assistance. Time will tell whether in this potential legal conflict between religious and medical institutions, the law may yet facilitate higher numbers.

By Ana Lita|2017-08-23T21:48:17+00:00August 23rd, 2017|News-Articles|0 Comments

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

facebooktwitterlinkedinreddittumblrpinterestvkEmail

About the Author: Ana Lita

Ana Lita

Related Posts

  • Call for Applications! Bioethics of AI: The Intersection of AI and Medicine” Online Winter School December 16-21, 2024
    Call for Applications! Bioethics of AI: The Intersection of AI and Medicine” Online Winter School December 16-21, 2024
    Gallery

    Call for Applications! Bioethics of AI: The Intersection of AI and Medicine” Online Winter School December 16-21, 2024

  • AI Ethics: Why it matters! by Adarsh Srivastava, PGDISAD, Head of Data & Analytics Quality Assurance at Roche Diagnostics
    AI Ethics: Why it matters! by Adarsh Srivastava, PGDISAD, Head of Data & Analytics Quality Assurance at Roche Diagnostics
    Gallery

    AI Ethics: Why it matters! by Adarsh Srivastava, PGDISAD, Head of Data & Analytics Quality Assurance at Roche Diagnostics

  • A Unique, Eye-opening experience: A physician’s perspective by Rola Itani, MD
    A Unique, Eye-opening experience: A physician’s perspective by Rola Itani, MD
    Gallery

    A Unique, Eye-opening experience: A physician’s perspective by Rola Itani, MD

  • Jonathan D. Moreno Ph.D. Keynote Speaker
    Jonathan D. Moreno Ph.D. Keynote Speaker
    Gallery

    Jonathan D. Moreno Ph.D. Keynote Speaker

  • Jeanne F. Loring Ph.D. Keynote Speaker
    Jeanne F. Loring Ph.D. Keynote Speaker
    Gallery

    Jeanne F. Loring Ph.D. Keynote Speaker

Leave A Comment Cancel reply

Copyright 2012 - 2020 Global Bioethics | All Rights Reserved | Powered by Global Innovation Consortium
facebooktwitterlinkedin
Toggle Sliding Bar Area