Skip to content
646 269 0773|alita@globalbioethics.org
facebooktwitterlinkedin
Global Bioethics Initiative (GBI) Logo Global Bioethics Initiative (GBI) Logo Global Bioethics Initiative (GBI) Logo
  • Home
  • About
  • Staff
    • Founders
    • Board of Directors
    • Advisory Board
    • Visiting Scholars
    • Student Interns
    • Volunteers
  • Events
  • Resources
    • COVID-19
  • Internships
  • Contact
  • Donate
Previous Next
  • View Larger Image

Disability Rights Advocates Sue Uber for Wheelchair Inaccessible Cars

Nonprofit organization Disability Rights Advocates has filed a class-action lawsuit against Uber, claiming that the ride service discriminates against riders with disabilities in New York City. Filed in New York State Supreme Court in Manhattan on Tuesday, July 18th, the suit is founded on the accusation that Uber does not supply enough available wheelchair-accessible cars through its app.

According to the New York Times, the lawsuit alleges that though Uber provides wheelchair-accessible cars through its related service UberWAV, the specially equipped vehicles “account for a tiny fraction of the 58,000 for-hire cars dispatched by Uber in New York City’s five boroughs” and that “this already limited pool of cars can be used for other riders, and… may be unavailable when needed by those with disabilities.”

Filed on behalf of numerous advocacy organizations and individual New Yorkers, the lawsuit comes after two discrimination lawsuits against the Metropolitan Transportation Authority regarding the subway system’s dearth of elevators and lifts. The suit requests that the court order Uber to “develop and implement a remedial plan to ensure full and equal access to its services for riders who require accessible transportation.”

For its part, Uber has in the past offered monetary incentives to drivers of wheelchair-accessible cars. It has also suggested that New York City law implement an “accessibility fee” on certain types of rides across companies to raise funds for further monetary incentives. The case raises notable questions regarding civil and corporate duties to persons with disabilities.

By Ana Lita|2020-04-09T23:43:47+00:00July 20th, 2017|News-Articles|0 Comments

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

facebooktwitterlinkedinreddittumblrpinterestvkEmail

About the Author: Ana Lita

Ana Lita

Related Posts

  • Call for Applications! Bioethics of AI: The Intersection of AI and Medicine” Online Winter School December 16-21, 2024
    Call for Applications! Bioethics of AI: The Intersection of AI and Medicine” Online Winter School December 16-21, 2024
    Gallery

    Call for Applications! Bioethics of AI: The Intersection of AI and Medicine” Online Winter School December 16-21, 2024

  • AI Ethics: Why it matters! by Adarsh Srivastava, PGDISAD, Head of Data & Analytics Quality Assurance at Roche Diagnostics
    AI Ethics: Why it matters! by Adarsh Srivastava, PGDISAD, Head of Data & Analytics Quality Assurance at Roche Diagnostics
    Gallery

    AI Ethics: Why it matters! by Adarsh Srivastava, PGDISAD, Head of Data & Analytics Quality Assurance at Roche Diagnostics

  • A Unique, Eye-opening experience: A physician’s perspective by Rola Itani, MD
    A Unique, Eye-opening experience: A physician’s perspective by Rola Itani, MD
    Gallery

    A Unique, Eye-opening experience: A physician’s perspective by Rola Itani, MD

  • Jonathan D. Moreno Ph.D. Keynote Speaker
    Jonathan D. Moreno Ph.D. Keynote Speaker
    Gallery

    Jonathan D. Moreno Ph.D. Keynote Speaker

  • Jeanne F. Loring Ph.D. Keynote Speaker
    Jeanne F. Loring Ph.D. Keynote Speaker
    Gallery

    Jeanne F. Loring Ph.D. Keynote Speaker

Leave A Comment Cancel reply

Recent Tweets

Tweets by GBISummerSchool

Find us on Facebook

Copyright 2012 - 2020 Global Bioethics | All Rights Reserved | Powered by Global Innovation Consortium
facebooktwitterlinkedin
Toggle Sliding Bar Area